← Back to all posts

Someone asked me how I was doing on a Tuesday morning outside my office door, the kind of question people ask without really expecting an answer, and I said "fine"... which is what I always said. Except that week I'd buried a former student, my knee had been aching for three months in a way I was pretending not to notice, and I hadn't slept a full night since a district budget meeting went sideways. None of that was fine. But "fine" came out anyway, fast and automatic, the way a reflex does.

I'd like to tell you I caught myself in the moment. I didn't. I caught myself an hour later, alone in my car in the parking lot, wondering why a one-word answer to a hallway question had left me feeling more tired than the question itself.

"Fine" Isn't a Lie. It's a Placeholder.

Here's what I've come to believe after thirty years of running schools and forty-two years of marriage: most of us aren't lying when we say "fine." We're reaching for a placeholder because we never learned the real word. Psychologist Lisa Feldman Barrett calls this emotional granularity — the ability to identify what you're actually feeling with some precision, instead of reaching for one of three or four blunt categories: fine, stressed, tired, fine again. People with low granularity, her research shows, don't just describe their inner life poorly. They regulate it poorly. You can't manage what you can't name.

"How long, LORD? Will you forget me forever? How long will you hide your face from me? How long must I wrestle with my thoughts and day after day have sorrow in my heart?" — Psalm 13:1–2

What gets me every time I read that psalm is how specific it is. The writer doesn't say "I'm not doing great." He names the forgetting, the hiding, the wrestling, the sorrow — four distinct textures of one bad season, laid out loud, to God, without editing them down to something more presentable. That's not weakness. That's precision. The Psalms are, among other things, a four-thousand-year-old emotional vocabulary lesson, and most of us are still stuck saying "fine."

Let's Be Honest About Why We Do It

I didn't say "fine" that morning because I was trying to deceive anyone. I said it because naming the actual thing — grief, worry, a body getting older, exhaustion I couldn't fully explain — felt like it would cost more than I had to spend in a two-minute hallway conversation. "Fine" is cheap. Precision is expensive. It asks something of the person receiving it, and it asks something of you first, which is to sit with what's actually there instead of filing it under a word that closes the conversation.

I've watched this in men especially — I was one of them for most of my life — where the entire emotional vocabulary shrinks down to "fine," "pissed," and "fine" again, said with more edge the second time. Not because the feelings underneath are actually that simple. Because nobody ever handed us the rest of the words, and admitting you need them feels like admitting a deficiency instead of building a skill.

Brené Brown spent seven years and thousands of interviews mapping this exact gap for her book Atlas of the Heart, and one of her findings stuck with me more than any single word she catalogued: most people can accurately identify only three emotions in the moment they're having them — happy, sad, and angry — even though the human emotional range runs to well over eighty distinct states. We're not short on feelings. We're short on the words to find them.

What I'm Doing About It Now

I stopped answering in one word. When someone genuinely asks, I try to give them one real sentence instead of one reflexive syllable. "Tired in a way I haven't figured out yet" costs almost nothing extra and tells the truth.

I built a small vocabulary on purpose. Not clinical language — just more words than four. Restless instead of stressed. Wistful instead of fine. Depleted instead of tired. The word doesn't fix anything by itself, but it points at the actual shape of the thing, and you can't address a shape you haven't located.

I ask better questions of other people. "How are you, really" sounds like a small edit. It changes the whole exchange. Most people have an honest answer sitting right behind the automatic one — they're just waiting for someone to signal that the honest one is welcome.

That knee still aches most mornings. I've stopped calling it fine. I call it what it is — a body that's given me forty years of good work and is starting to send me the bill — and something about naming it accurately, instead of waving it off, makes it easier to actually tend to, instead of just enduring.

What's the word you keep reaching for because it's easier than the true one — and what would it cost you to say the real word instead, just once this week?

← More Writing